Welcome!

Liberty Insight is a discussion of economic and social issues from a liberty-minded perspective. We aim to show why a free society- with a limited government that follows the Constitution- brings people together and improves the quality of life for all. We also aim to help people protect and build their wealth in extraordinary economic times.

Please spread the word by sharing posts you like on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, or your favorite online community. And don’t forget to subscribe on the right sidebar to get your weekly dose of liberty.

Posted in Uncategorized

Chart of the Week: Federal Spending and the Sequester

This incredible chart speaks volumes about the circus act that we call our government. The spikes towards the left are for WWI and WWII.  The chart really speaks for itself, but I can’t resist the urge to highlight a few important points below.

federal spending and sequester

The obvious takeaway is to notice just how tiny the spending cut is compared to all time record high inflation adjusted spending. (If I could nitpick a bit, it’s not just Obama calling these cuts catastrophic, but the Democrats, most Republicans, and every mainstream news source.) Compare that tiny sequester cut to the roughly 70% budget cut we had in 3 years after WWII. (Contrary to popular delusion, it was those dramatic spending cuts after the war coupled with being the world’s only producer with factories still standing that got us out of the depression, not the Wartime spending.)

Next, please note that this chart is of inflation adjusted federal spending. In other words, if per capita federal spending were to stay about the same we would expect a gentle rise in line with population growth. In 1913, the year the Federal Reserve Bank was created and the income tax was created, Federal Government spending was $715 million. Adjusted for inflation that equals $16.8 billion. There were 97 million Americans back then, meaning that in 1913 the Federal government spent $173 per person in today’s dollars.

Today, the Federal government spends $3.8 trillion annually (not counting what it owes to SS and Medicare trust fund) and the population is 314 million people. Today the Federal government spends $12,100 per person. That’s 70 times what we spent in 1913. If we include what the government should be putting into SS and Medicare each year to be actuarially sound, Federal spending would be around $9.5T or $30,000 per person or 175 times the spending of 1913.

Another important factor to notice is that the slope of the graph is increasing. In other words, the rate of the increase of inflation adjusted government spending is increasing.

However, there’s one more factor that could be playing a role in the astounding rise in government spending per person. That is, the CPI is not fully discounting the inflation rate. As I discussed in a post called Government Numbers, the government has an incentive to understate (i.e. hide) (i.e. lie about) inflation and has even changed the methodology for calculating inflation over the past few decades. If we used the same CPI deflator methodology we used in 1970, which I believe is more accurate, we get a per capita spending in 1913 of $668 or 18 times less than what we spend today. Better than 70 times, but still absurd.

In Summary:

1. All this talk of draconian cuts of the sequester is a load of crap.

2. The fact that we can’t cut even a tiny amount without inducing panic reflects just how fragile and over-leveraged our economy is.

3. The inflation adjusted federal spending since the inception of the Federal Reserve and income tax has been rising at an accelerating rate. And if we use GAAP (i.e. non-fraudulent) accounting the government spending is so mind bogglingly disgusting the mind rejects it.

4. One more bit of evidence that the official CPI is suspect at best.

Posted in Chart of the Week, Economy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking: Sequester to Increase Risk of Alien Invasion

alien invationAccording to sources inside the White House, the odds of invasion from an intergalactic armed force will be greatly enhanced if the sequester is not avoided, as reported by CNN.

“If these draconian budget cuts go through,” said a source who wished to remain anonymous, “many of the 52,000 Dept. of Homeland Security agents, who sit on remote mountain tops scanning the night sky with binoculars for alien warships will need to be furloughed. This will greatly hinder our ability to detect an invasion in a timely manner which could lead to the total destruction of life as we know it and enslavement of the human race by alien ant overlords.”

A high ranking officer at the Dept. of Defense echoed those concerns. “The devastating cuts would cripple our military to such a degree that we’d practically be inviting space aliens to attack. With no means of defense from the world’s lone super power, the entire human race would be doomed. Even if space aliens don’t attack, these drastic and irresponsible cuts would mean we could only wipe Iran off the map 375 times.”

White House Press Secretary, Jay Carney, summed up the sequester debate in a recent press conference. “The choice is simple, we can either take responsible measures to avoid these draconian, meat-cleaver cuts, or we can follow the republican plan in which space aliens eat our men and enslave our women and children.” He latter added, “Draconian!”

However, brilliant economist and Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman sees a silver lining in an attack by space aliens. “While I generally abhor these draconian and stupidly irresponsible spending cuts, the good news is that a prolonged alien attack would destroy vast amounts of property and infrastructure. This would allow us to print tens of trillions of dollars to build up a massive arsenal to fend off the attack and then provide millions of jobs for years to come as we rebuild our scorched cities. While the loss of life would be unfortunate, it would really jumpstart the economy.”

Continue reading

Posted in Economy, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Dipping My Toes Into Anarcho-Capitalism (the water feels nice)

state vs market graphicAs a staunch libertarian, it’s pretty rare for me to come across someone who is more libertarian than I. By “more libertarian”, I mean that they believe in even less government than I do. Perhaps that’s why I was oddly excited, intrigued and energized when I first heard libertarian/anarcho-capitalist, Stefan Molyneux from Freedomain Radio as a guest host on the Peter Schiff radio show.

To back up a bit, most people are shocked when I tell them I think the federal government should be about 5-10% the size it is today. At a time when Democrats and Republicans in Congress can’t seem to find areas to even slow the growth of the budget, I would lop off 90-95% of federal spending if I were in charge. If we returned to the government laid out by the Constitution, I argue, the tiny federal government would provide national defense, (the kind that defends U.S. soil from invading armies, but does not police the world and embark on wars of aggression and empire) it would have a small court system to prosecute a few federal crimes like treason, ensure free trade among the states, and deliver the mail (although, nowadays they shouldn’t be doing that either). Then the tiny state governments could fill in the gaps by protecting property rights, enforcing contracts, and prosecuting violent crime.

Since nearly everyone wants more government than I do, I’ve heard all of the arguments from that side of the ledger. They’ll argue, “But of course we need the government to… (insert government program here). Don’t you want… (roads, clean air, education, a safety net, people not to become drug addicts, poor people not to die in the streets)” Well, of course I do; I just believe that there are better ways of achieving those ends than through a state controlled monopoly that uses force and coercion as its means.

As I hear the tiresome arguments for more government control and centralized power I just shake my head and think to myself, “Common, Bob (or Joe or Sally). You’re a smart and creative person. Can you really not rack your brain and come up with any way we might educate our kids other than having Washington DC take a chunk of everyone’s paycheck and then dictate the curriculum for union teachers to regurgitate on a chalkboard? Can you not imagine how potholes might get filled or food might grow without federal subsidies? Do you not realize that we didn’t even have an income tax for the majority of this country’s existence?”

Back to the radio show, as I listened to Mr. Molyneux discuss true freedom from a philosophical approach and explain why he viewed “the state” (i.e. government) as immoral, violent and unnecessary, I began to wonder, “Was I guilty of the very same unquestioned acceptance of the need for “some” government as the big government people I had so smugly deplored?” Continue reading

Posted in Community, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 12 Comments

Act Now! Sale Ends Soon. Gold Prices Could Explode Any Day. (part 2)

Before I get started, here’s a quick poll:

The above poll is a bit facetious. It’s more of an exercise to get your mental juices flowing and hopefully put you in a bit more introspective state of mind as you read this post. My goal for this post is to present a compelling case to invest in gold based on the fundamentals and current macro-trends in the gold market. I hope to have you asking yourself, “Why don’t I own gold? How much should I own? How can I find out more?”

I use the term “invest” in gold, but I don’t really consider gold to be an investment. Gold is money. It is savings or a store of value. But unlike every other form of currency, including the dollar, it can’t be devalued by a central banker printing more of it. In times of money printing and economic uncertainty, gold can gain substantially in purchasing power making it seem like an investment.

In part 1 of this post, I outlined why the prices of gold and silver have come off their highs and have been in a holding pattern for the past 16 months even as the fundamental reasons for owning gold have improved substantially. In this post, I hope to explain why gold and silver could shoot up at any moment like a beach ball that has been held under water as the water level rose around it. Continue reading

Posted in Investing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Act Now! Sale Ends Soon. These Prices Won’t Last! (part 1)

macys_perfect saleI was joking the other day about how I get an email from Macy’s every day alerting me that some special sale is ending tomorrow and I need to act now to save 15-25%. Actually, it wasn’t really a joke because I have gotten an email like that from Macy’s just about every day since Halloween. It’s just kind of funny.

I am now fully desensitized to any sale by Macy’s since I’m sure the next one will be right around the corner just as sure as Joseph A. Banks will be having a three-for-one special on men’s suits before I finish typing. It’s kind of like the boy who cried wolf.

I bring it up because several times in the past few years I have recommended buying gold and silver (since they were at $1155 and $18 respectively) and I hope readers don’t think I’m crying wolf when I say (once again) that this may be your last great chance to buy gold and silver before they take off and don’t look back. 2013 is shaping up to be the perfect storm for a rising gold price. Silver, which trades in lock step with gold but with more volatility, is poised to do even better in my opinion. For this article, I will focus on gold but in general these ideas hold for silver as well. Continue reading

Posted in Investing | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Incredible New Documentary- Breaking the Taboo

It’s nearly indisputable that narcotic drug abuse causes serious problems, not only for the abuser, but for their family and friends as well. Drugs such as cocaine, heroine, meth, and others can be addictive and extremely dangerous. So how should we deal with this deadly problem?

Intuition tells us that since drugs can be extremely harmful, they should be illegal. We should discourage people from using them in the first place by making their use illegal, and we should have harsh penalties for anyone who tries to produce or distribute these dangerous drugs. It’s common sense…

And it’s completely wrong. The “war on drugs” has been a complete and utter failure based on every objective measure. Since the war on drugs was first declared, drug use, drug abuse, and especially drug related crime has surged. America now has the highest incarceration rate on the planet. After 50 years of data, it is clear that the war on drugs has achieved the exact opposite of what it intended.

Don’t believe me? That’s understandable. It’s hard to overcome 40 years of government propaganda through our school system and media in a single blog post. Perhaps, this Incredible one hour documentary, Breaking the Taboo, can help convince you that there’s a better way to deal with narcotic drugs. Even a former drug warrior like Bill Clinton has changed his mind after seeing how his own policies didn’t work (and now that he doesn’t have lobbyists whispering in his ear). From the documentary website: “We must seriously consider shifting resources away from criminalising tens of millions of otherwise law-abiding citizens, and move towards an approach based on health, harm-reduction, cost-effectiveness and respect for human rights.”

There is a huge vested interest in keeping the drug war in place. Police and Federal agencies get massive windfalls from confiscation of property suspected of being involved in a drug crime. Private prisons profit from outsourcing their slave labor. There have even been allegations that the CIA is actively involved in the drug trade. Politicians can exploit the issue to get elected and grow their power.

The only way we will see an end to this destructive war is if a large majority of the voting public learns the truth and demands a change. The truth is this — drug abuse is a health problem and criminalizing the activity of drug use creates a deadly criminal infrastructure and destroys people’s lives.

Please watch the trailer below and then visit the breaking the taboo website to watch the whole film and sign the petition. And if you like it, please pass this along.

Posted in Civil Rights, Foreign Policy | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Liberty Newswire 11/28/12

[The Liberty Insight Newswire is an aggregation of what we consider to be important financial and political news and commentary from across the web.]

Cartoon by Henry Payne

This week’s post election hangover edition of the newswire discusses pot legalization in CO and WA, the REAL U.S. debt, a scary student loan delinquency chart, the death of the penny, and a little treat from The Onion. Continue reading

Posted in Newswire | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Real Fiscal Cliff

fiscal cliff cartoon

“Uh oh! We better stay on the current path.”

Even before the last balloon hit the floor at President Obama’s victory party, the media had already shifted its focus to the looming fiscal cliff. The chorus call from the mainstream media is that our political leaders need to “come together” to “compromise” so that we can avoid going over the cliff. Failure to avoid the cliff, they say, will be a disaster.

But what exactly is the fiscal cliff? It’s a roughly $600 billion yearly deficit reduction through tax increases and discretionary spending cuts starting in 2013. To be more specific, it’s about $400B in tax increases, $100B in spending cuts that aren’t actually cuts but a reduction in the amount the spending will increase, and about $100B of estimated revenue from economic growth. You can find out the exact numbers elsewhere. Wikipedia has a good summary. The purpose of this post is to add some perspective on what the fiscal cliff really means in the greater scheme of things. Continue reading

Posted in Economy, Just For Fun | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Election Day Primer

I was hoping to post this yesterday but ran out of time. Better late than never. For my American readers (ha) who have yet to vote may I offer some food for thought?

Vote your conscience!

Your vote isn’t going to swing the election one way or another. Even if you gather a hundred of your friends and have them vote with you it won’t swing the election. And unless you live in one of the eight or so swing states it won’t even mater if you gather up 1000 people to vote with you. The President is elected by the electoral college and in most states, the outcome is set in stone.

The whole Red Team vs. Blue Team is just psychological BS propaganda that has been programed into us by the media and entrenched interests. Don’t fall for it!

If you really think Obama is the best man for the job then by all means vote for him. Same goes for Romney. I, for one, think there is maybe 5% difference between them. I would urge people to look into the third party candidates and find the candidate that best matches their beliefs. The chart below shows how one of those candidates, Gary Johnson stacks up to Obomney.

Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

“Price Gouging” During a Disaster is Good

Natural disasters are terrible any way you slice it. Hurricane Sandy was a particularly devastating storm for people in the Northeast. My heart goes out to those people affected by the storm, especially those who have lost loved ones. Having grown up in New Jersey, I still have many friends who live in that area, including a cousin who’s in-laws have a house on the Jersey Shore that is underwater. Some of their neighbors’ houses were completely wiped away by the surge.

Aside from the obvious personal and financial damage from the storm, one downside of natural disasters that particularly irks me is the inevitable bad economics and political grandstanding that fills the airwaves after such an event. It bothers me because it is a self-destructive response that has real negative consequences on people’s lives and that it is completely avoidable if people only took the time to understand basic economics.

There are the Keynesian economists like Paul Krugman who jump at the chance to decry that the storm, while bad, will at least stimulate economic activity, so there is a bright side. This dumb idea, known as the “broken window fallacy” has been well explained and debunked by economists like Bastiat and Henry Hazlitt.

Then there are the big government lovers who pound the table that we need to expand FEMA and other federal programs to aid disaster victims. These include the politicians who like to show how caring and generous they are by pledging to spend (other people’s) money to help the victims. But as Katrina demonstrated, FEMA is just another bureaucracy that hinders real aid from occurring. The government programs for flood insurance subsidies and other programs create a moral hazard that encourages people to build in risky areas. The topic of how Federal programs for disaster victims are negative to society and how the free market can, and has, handled disaster relief much better could fill a book and is not the point of this essay.

The topic I want to address here is “price gouging” because it always comes up, and it seems so obvious to people that raising prices on essential goods when people are already in a desperate situation is just evil. In fact, far from being evil, it is simply a market response that helps get goods and services to people who need them most as efficiently as possible. Continue reading

Posted in Community, Economy | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments